src='https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js?client=ca-pub-2513966551258002'/> Rightways: Law Infolinks.com, 2618740 , RESELLER

Pages

Share This

Deepseek https://www.deepseek.com/./深度求索 DeepSeek | 深度求索 https://askaichat.app/chat
Showing posts with label Law. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Law. Show all posts

Saturday, June 21, 2025

Global campaign to repatriate looted cultural relics gains momentum as voices demand justice, heritage restitution

 

Artifacts on display during a bronze repatriation ceremony in Abuja, the capital of Nigeria on December 20, 2022. Photo: VCG

Cultural artifacts are more than historical remnants; they embody the spirit of a nation and a civilization. 

In recent years, some countries have not only stepped up cultural preservation efforts, but also worked actively to recover artifacts looted during colonial times. Recently, the Global Times interviewed officials in Egypt and Nigeria, as well as representatives from civil groups in Japan and other countries, to learn how those looted treasures are making their way home.

'We cannot leave this to the next generation'

On June 14, 2025, Japanese civic organization Chinese Cultural Relics Return Movement Promotion Association hosted a public lecture in Tokyo that focused on Japan's wartime archaeological activities and cultural relics looted from China and called for the return of looted cultural relics and the reconstruction of related academic ethics, according to the Xinhua News Agency.

Founded in 2021, the civic group seeks to push for the return of relics taken during the First Sino-Japanese War, also known as the Jiawu War (1894-95), the Russo-Japanese War (1904-05) and the War of Resistance against Japanese Aggression (1931-45).

Keiichiro Ichinose, a Japanese lawyer and the group's founder, told the Global Times that returning these artifacts is a necessary reckoning with Japan's imperialist and colonial past.

In 2012, the Palace Museum in Beijing published a catalogue listing 15,245 rare Chinese cultural artifacts that entered Japan between the First Sino-Japanese War and the end of World War II in 1945. From 1931 to 1945, Japan looted 1,879 crates of Chinese cultural relics. The total number of items is incalculable, according to Xinhua.

Among these are several artifacts the association is specifically demanding be returned, such as three Chinese stone lions looted from Northeast China's Liaoning Province. Two of them are displayed outside the notorious Yasukuni Shrine, while the third is housed in the Tochigi Prefecture. Another item is the Chinese Tang Honglu well Stele of the Tang Dynasty (618-907), looted from Dalian, Northeast China's Liaoning Province, in 1908 and currently stored out of public view in the Fukiage Garden of Japan's Imperial Palace as "national property," according to Xinhua.

Ichinose told the Global Times that since March 2022, the association has been sending formal requests to the Yasukuni Shrine demanding the return of Chinese cultural property. It was not until May 18, 2023, that they secured their first - and so far only - meeting with shrine staff.

"That day, we spoke with the Yasukuni Shrine's general affairs director and section chief," Ichinose recalled. 

"We submitted a second request on July 26, 2023. On August 9, we received a response saying there were 'no developments to report at this time.'"

"Still, we submitted a third request on October 4, 2023. On October 18, we got a reply stating that Yasukuni had already 'expressed its stance' and would not offer another meeting," he said.

"At the same year, We sent a fourth petition on November 30, and received a reply on December 13, that was essentially a repeat of their previous response," Ichinose said. "Even when we presented new evidence, the shrine refused to comment. We will continue to press firmly to prevent them from thinking this issue can simply be ignored." 

The Chinese Tang Honglu well Stele is considered one of the most significant Chinese artifacts looted by Japan. Ichinose said the association had attempted to negotiate with the Imperial Household Agency through a Japanese lawmaker. However, when the supportive lawmaker lost his seat, talks stalled. The group is currently reaching out to other lawmakers in hopes of reviving the discussion.

Today, many Western countries are returning cultural artifacts looted during colonial times, but Japan shows a negative attitude. Ichinose pointed out this stems from the Japanese government's failure to fully reflect on its history of aggression and colonization. As a result, Tokyo has little intention of addressing these lingering historical injustices, including the return of looted artifacts.

According to him, the Chinese Cultural Relics Return Movement Promotion Association holds regular meetings every month to discuss future actions. Each year, it also organizes two major public gatherings calling on the Japanese government to return looted Chinese relics.

When the association was established in 2021, Ichinose found, very few Japanese people - apart from a handful of scholars - were even aware of Japan's looting of Chinese cultural property.

In recent years, as the group's efforts expanded, media attention increased, and more citizens began voluntarily participating in its events.

"Returning looted Chinese artifacts should have been resolved in the last century," Ichinose told the Global Times. "It keeps getting delayed. As Japanese citizens, we believe it's our responsibility to urge the government to act - we cannot pass this burden on to the next generation."

Return of a mummy head

On May 12, 2025, Egypt's Ministry of Foreign Affairs announced it had recovered 25 smuggled cultural relics of significant historical and artistic value following negotiations with the US, marking the country's latest success in reclaiming looted artifacts, Xinhua reported. 
Mohamed Ismail Khaled, secretary-general of Egypt's Supreme Council of Antiquities, told the Global Times that since 2014, Egypt has successfully retrieved more than 30,000 cultural artifacts.

"As someone who has long worked in the field of cultural repatriation, I know that behind every returned artifact lies the tireless effort and perseverance of many people. These relics are not just witnesses of history - they are essential components of our national cultural identity," he said.

In August 2024, three smuggled artifacts, which belong to the Late Period of Ancient Egypt (747-332 BC), were returned to Egypt from the Netherlands: a blue porcelain ushabti statue, part of a wooden coffin decorated with inscriptions of goddess Isis, and a head of mummy in a good state of preservation with remains of teeth and hair, the Egyptian Ministry of Tourism and Antiquities said in a statement, Xinhua reported.

Khaled said the figurine and coffin fragment were found inside an antique store in the Netherlands, and the Dutch and Egyptian authorities conducted necessary investigations that showed they were illegally smuggled from Egypt, reported Xinhua.

A Dutch individual handed over the mummified head, which he had inherited from a family member, to local authorities, according to AP News.

According to Egyptian media, Leiden University later conducted a chemical analysis of the resin preservatives on the mummified head. The composition matched mummies excavated in Alexandria from the same period, and the skull bore surgical perforations consistent with medical texts from Egypt's Ptolemaic Dynasty (305-30 BC). On this basis, Dutch authorities decided to return the mummy head to Egypt.

Although Egypt has made notable strides in recovering artifacts, Professor Alnajib Alabdulla from the Department of History at Cairo University told the Global Times that the repatriation process remains deeply challenging.

First, many relics were taken illegally decades or even centuries ago, and there is often little documentation or hard evidence, which severely hampers recovery efforts. Second, the legal systems and cultural policies of different countries vary widely, complicating negotiations. Lastly, some artifacts are now in private collections or on the auction market, making it extremely time- and resource-intensive to trace their provenance, according to Alabdulla.

Alabdulla said that Egypt plans to sign more bilateral agreements and long-term cooperation mechanisms on cultural protection and restitution. The country will also build a comprehensive digital database to document each artifact for easier identification and tracking.

Restoring African dignity

Recently, at the National Museum of Ethnology in Leiden, the Netherlands, a staff member wearing blue latex gloves carefully removed a priceless artifact from its display, gently placed it on a padded surface, and wrapped it in several layers of special protective paper. 

According to AFP, the item was a Benin Bronze, an invaluable artifact looted from present-day Nigeria more than 120 years ago. It is now being prepared for repatriation.

Rev. Anamah N.U.B, head of the Cultural Industries and Heritage at Nigeria's Ministry of Art, Culture, Tourism and the Creative Economy, told the Global Times that as an ancient African civilization, Nigeria has spent decades working to reclaim its looted cultural heritage.

Anamah said that in recent years, Nigeria's Ministry of Foreign Affairs has led the charge in recovering these treasures. 
As a result, countries such as the UK, the US, and Germany have already returned or committed to returning certain artifacts.

"However, some countries or institutions in possession of looted relics often show reluctance to return them," Anamah said. 

He said that these countries should not only return the artifacts but also pay reparations to the source nations, as they have benefited economically from these items over the past centuries.

As the global push for artifact repatriation gains momentum, not only governments but also civil organizations are playing a crucial role in driving the process forward.

One such organization is Open Restitution Africa, founded in 2020. It aims to reshape the global narrative to center African voices in heritage discourse.

Members of Open Restitution Africa shared extensive documentation with the Global Times, detailing the historical significance of various African artifacts, their illicit removal from the continent, and the current status of their repatriation efforts.

In 1830, the Véro brothers, French specimen makers, exhumed the remains of a warrior in what is now around Botswana and South Africa and turned the body into a display specimen. After changing hands several times, the remains were put on public display in 1916 at a museum in Spain, under the label "The Negro of Banyoles," according to the BBC. 

For decades, the exhibit went unchallenged - until 1991, when Alphonse Arcelin, a Haitian doctor of African descent, wrote to Banyoles authorities demanding the remains be returned for burial. 

His call was initially met with resistance from local politicians and the public. Following years of intense negotiations, the human remains were returned home in 2000.

According to the Open Restitution Africa, returning the remains of "The Negro of Banyoles" and ensuring a proper burial was vital - not only for restoring the dignity of the deceased but also for affirming the dignity of all the people of Africa.


Thursday, June 12, 2025

Selangor launches RM100m plan to fix strata title backlog, starting with six apartments

  • Flat Bunga Raya in Port Klang is one of the six places chosen for the Selangor apartment strata pilot project in 2025. — Picture from Facebook/White Flag Group (WFG)
  • The state government has budgeted RM10 million this year for the initiative.
  • The state expects the entire exercise to cost RM100 million over 10 years.
  • Six highrises have been chosen as pilot projects.

PUCHONG, June 9 — The Selangor government has launched a RM100 million initiative to resolve long-standing strata title issues affecting apartment owners across the state.

Menteri Besar Datuk Seri Amirudin Shari said the Selangor Strata Fund will address the problem in phases, starting with six pilot projects, The Star reported today.

These include Flat Bunga Raya in Port Klang, Pangsapuri Seroja in Puchong, Apartment Dahlia in Rawang, Rumah Bandar Taman Saga in Ampang, and Pangsapuri Permai and Pangsapuri Seri Damai in Batu Caves.

“Although this involves significant financial implications for the state, the initiative will be continued in the interest of current owners and the future generations, to enable secure inheritance of the properties,” he was quoted as saying at a community event at the Taman Putra Perdana Food Court here. 

Amirudin said RM10 million has been allocated this year under the state budget to kick-start the initiative. 

He estimated a total of RM100 million would be needed to resolve all strata title cases over the next decade.

He said the strata title is crucial in clarifying ownership, easing the inheritance process, and protecting the rights of heirs.

Amirudin also said the state expects the fund to bring returns within 10 years, as units with strata titles will begin paying parcel quit rent.

Also present at the launch was state housing and culture committee chairman Datuk Borhan Aman Shah.

Borhan said strata housing in Selangor has expanded rapidly, with over 898,000 titles registered as of 2023.

He added that 648 schemes involving 138,817 residential units have yet to secure strata titles since 2007.

Source link


Selangor starts fund to resolve strata title issues | The Star 


The Star
https://www.thestar.com.my › metro-news › 2025/06/09


Saturday, April 12, 2025

Law must make strata watchdogs act

ation: Liu Rui/GT -    

DeepSeek | 深度求索  

  PETALING JAYA: From run-down facilities and dirty walkways to allegations of misused management funds, the issue of poor property and building management continues to plague stratified homes in Malaysia.

With the government now mulling changes to property and building management laws, stakeholders say the focus should be on improving enforcement by the commissioner of buildings (CoB).

The new laws must improve and mandate the CoB to enforce laws under the Strata Management Act (SMA) 2013, said Datuk Theng Book, chairman of the Strata Owners Association Malaysia.

“There’s been a serious lack of enforcement by CoBs. In most cases, they will pass the buck back to management bodies.

“Management corporations (MCs) and joint management committees (JMCs) do not have the authority to enforce the laws,” he said.

This then usually leads to long-drawn-out and expensive civil court cases, he said.

Theng said the new laws must also clarify how MCs or JMCs can use maintenance funds, and standardise maintenance fee rates in the growing trend of mixed development stratified projects.

“The maintenance fee rates for residential and commercial tenants can vary wildly from project to project,” he said.

Michelle Lai, director of property management company Auntie Michelle Resources (M) Sdn Bhd, says the problem is also due to a lack of standardised enforcement and training in the industry.

“There is no consistency as different management offices enforce different rules which leads to confusion, especially for owners and investors who have units in different buildings,” said Lai.

“Many JMCs are not professionally trained and lack the capacity to manage buildings properly.”

She added that new laws should have CoBs demanding greater accountability and professionalism from JMCs and MCs.

“CoBs can perform regular transparent audits of management bodies and set clear enforcement standard operating procedures.

“They should also conduct perio­dic on-site inspections to assess building safety, especially for ageing properties.

“In addition, there must be a mandatory guideline for sche­duled refurbishment and main­tenance of property,” she added.

Malaysian Institute of Property and Facility Managers president Ishak Ismail said any new pro­perty management laws must provide more enforcement mechanisms for management bodies.

On Tuesday, Housing and Local Government Minister Nga Kor Ming announced that new laws may be formulated to overcome the issue of poor management of stratified homes.

He said there was a shortage of licensed property management firms in Malaysia, with only 594 licensed firms serving 26,334 strata schemes or 2.9 million units of Malaysian strata properties.

This has led to a rise in unlicensed and unqualified property managers

Related posts:

Commissioner Of Buildings (COB) In Malaysia, And Their 6 Main Functions



High-rise living in below par, need professionalism in managing the property\


Saturday, December 14, 2024

When a tenant refuses to leave

Purchasing a sub-sale property occasionally comes with a tenant included as part of the deal, according to the agent anyway. But what happens when all the documents are done and dusted, and then the tenant changes his/ her mind and refuses to leave?

Evictions happen more often than one might think, and the ensuing processes are some of the most headache-inducing, therapy-requiring tasks in the history of mankind.

how do cases like this even occur? sometimes, loopholes are present in documents like tenancy agreements.

As the legal contract between a landlord and a tenant, the papers outline every duty and obligation of each party while the tenancy is valid. It is extremely important to draft a well-written tenancy agreement. It might sound like the most obvious thing in the world, yet issues like these still prevail even today.

Understanding tenant’s rights

Before taking any measures, property owners need to grasp the rights afforded to tenants. Legal frameworks in most jurisdictions provide protections against unlawful eviction, which means that landlords must adhere to established protocols before evicting someone.

Ignoring these regulations can lead to legal repercussions, including financial penalties and potential lawsuits. Familiarising youself with the local tenantlandlord laws can help property owners avoid headache-inducing pitfalls.

The next course of action

■ Legal fees in eviction cases can reach up to RM30,000

■ Six months typical for case settlement

■ Keep detailed records of all interactions, payments and formal notices

should involve a thorough review of the tenancy agreement linked to the property.

As described by law firm Kevin Wu and Associates in their article titled “Tenancy Law in Malaysia: Evicting Tenants”, a tenancy agreement is a binding contract between a tenant and a landlord which outlines the rights and responsibilities of each party during the tenancy period. The tenancy period is usually created for a term which does not exceed three years, otherwise, it will be considered as a lease.

If the tenancy period has expired, they can issue a Notice to Quit, which formally requests the tenant to leave by a specific date, typically allowing a reasonable timeframe based on local regulations.

however, if the tenancy agreement is still active, the landlord will have to wait until its expiration or may need to explore other options, such as negotiating an early termination.

A Notice to Quit must be drafted per the specifics of the tenancy agreement and any local regulations, so consulting a real estate attorney is advisable.

This step ensures the notice is legally sound and appropriately delivered, protecting the landlord from potential disputes.

In the event the tenant does not move out of the rented property after the notice period ends or after the tenancy is terminated, and without the landlord’s consent, the tenant is liable to pay to the landlord double the rental payable under the tenancy pursuant to section 28(4) (a) of the civil Law Act 1956.

Attempting peaceful resolution

Often, proactive communication can help pave the way for a more positive and friendly resolution. Initiating a conversation with the tenant to discuss their situation and the possibility of vacating might be all it takes.

Offering flexible timelines or even financial incentives, such as a relocation bonus, or help with moving costs, can make the transition smoother for everyone involved. Establishing a cooperative dialogue mitigates stress and fosters goodwill, allowing both parties to reach an agreeable outcome.

If attempts at negotiation do not get the desired results and the tenant remains stubbornly uncooperative, seeking legal advice becomes paramount.

An experienced attorney specialising in landlord-tenant law can guide the property owner through the intricacies of the eviction process, from drafting necessary legal documentation to representing them in court if the situation takes a turn for the worse.

should legal proceedings become inevitable, initiating a lawsuit may involve filing a claim in a local court and subsequently obtaining a court order for eviction.

It is important to keep in mind that these processes can be time-consuming, sometimes stretching over several months and may lead to increased frustration and anxiety for property owners feeling trapped in their predicament.

The financial and emotional toll

The financial ramifications of an eviction can be substantial, adding to the overall stress of the situation. Legal fees can accumulate quickly, especially if the case drags on or requires multiple court appearances.

several studies have found that the fees can reach up to rm30,000 and the eviction process could drag on for half a year.

Additionally, there’s always the potential risk of property damage. In some unfortunate scenarios, tenants may do intentional harm to the property during their exit, resulting in costly repairs and delays in re-renting or selling the unit.

The emotional toll can also be significant. The anxiety, frustration and uncertainty in dealing with a non-compliant tenant can weigh heavily on property owners, making it difficult for them to focus on other aspects of their lives.

understanding that it’s normal for property owners to feel overwhelmed in these situations can be helpful, so seek out support from friends, family or even groups of fellow landlords who can provide the necessary guidance and reassurance needed.

Be proactive

To reduce the risk of facing similar challenges in the future, property owners should consider using several proactive strategies. First and foremost, thorough tenant screening is crucial.

conducting comprehensive background checks that include evaluating rental histories, credit scores and personal references can be beneficial.

A well-informed decision at the outset can minimise the likelihood of disputes later on.

Additionally, it is vital to draft a clear and comprehensive tenancy agreement that explicitly outlines all terms and conditions related to the lease.

This should cover aspects such as payment schedules, maintenance responsibilities, acceptable behaviour standards and clear procedures for termination.

A well-defined agreement can help forestall misunderstandings and promote clarity among both parties.

Maintaining open lines of communication with tenants is also essential. regular check-ins can help address any concerns they may have before they escalate into larger issues.

Moreover, keeping detailed records of all interactions, payments and formal notices can further protect property owners in any future disputes.

By SAMANTHA Wong samantha.wong@thestar.com.my

Related Stories

Tenant not entitled to compensation after