src='https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js?client=ca-pub-2513966551258002'/> Rightways Infolinks.com, 2618740 , RESELLER

Pages

Share This

Deepseek https://www.deepseek.com/./深度求索 DeepSeek | 深度求索 https://askaichat.app/chat

Monday, August 10, 2026

Don’t install apps under pressure, ‘I watched them take control of my phone remotely’

 

Compromised: Scammers are finding more sophisticated ways to bypass safeguards, such as malicious apps disguised as legitimate services. — Pic from magnific.com

PETALING JAYA: As smartphones become central to banking and daily life, scammers are finding increasingly sophisticated ways to seize control of the devices and the accounts within.

Universiti Sains Malaysia Cybersecurity Research Centre director Prof Dr Selvakumar Manickam said criminals were now turning to remote-access tools and malicious applications to bypass conventional scam safeguards.

He said victims could be persuaded to install apps such as AnyDesk or TeamViewer or malicious Android Package Kit (APK) files disguised as legitimate banking, delivery or other services.

Once installed and given permissions such as accessibility access, scammers could potentially view and operate the victim’s phone, including banking applications.

“An unsolicited caller asking the victim to download an app to ‘resolve’ an issue, a request to enable accessibility, SMS or ‘install unknown apps’ permissions, or being asked to remain on a call while installing something, should raise alarm bells,” he said when contacted.

Unexpected battery drain or unusual phone behaviour after installing an application, particularly one downloaded outside authorised sources, are also warning signs.

Selvakumar said scammers were increasingly exploiting psychology rather than simply trying to defeat technical security measures.

“They may create a sense of urgency by claiming a bank account has been frozen, a police matter needs to be resolved or an unpaid bill requires immediate action.

“Generative AI is also making scams more convincing with criminals able to produce polished phishing messages in local languages and clone voices to impersonate family members, bank officers or government officials,” he said.

Beyond screen control, malware can quietly intercept SMS messages and push notifications, including one-time passwords and two-factor authentication codes, before forwarding them to scammers.

Some newer malware could also identify a victim’s SIM card and mobile carrier before subscribing them to premium services through mobile billing systems.

“Fake cellular base stations have also been detected locally, allowing criminals to send fraudulent SMS messages while bypassing some telco-level filtering,” he added.

Selvakumar said the affected phone should subsequently be reset after important data has been backed up or checked by a trusted technician.

“The lesson is simple – never allow urgency or fear to override basic security precautions,” he said.

Cybersecurity expert Fong Choong Fook said social engineering remained one of the biggest threats despite growing public awareness.

“Don’t install any unknown or suspicious software. Have good practices such as not clicking on links from strangers or SMS,” he said.

Fong added that scammers impersonating bank employees, law enforcement officers and government officials could now use AI-generated voice and video to make their identities appear more convincing.

“Users should avoid public WiFi where possible as compromised networks could expose devices to additional risks.”

‘I watched them take control of my phone remotely’


PETALING JAYA: A routine phone call can quickly turn into a financial nightmare when unsuspecting victims lose control of their smartphones to scammers.

Confidential information and other personal details will then be manipulated by these fraudsters, causing financial and emotional distress to the victims.

For a Shah Alam resident who wished to be known only as Lim, the scam started with a phone call from a “bank officer”, warning him about suspicious transactions.

The caller instructed him to download an application, purportedly to verify his identity and secure his account.

Thinking he was following a security procedure, Lim installed the application and granted the requested authorisation.

“After installing it, it seemed that someone had taken control of my phone.

“I could see apps opening by themselves, but I could not control what was happening,” said the 42-year-old.

Within minutes, the scammers had gained access to his banking application and made several transactions.

Lim claimed that he lost about RM7,800 from his account before he managed to disconnect the phone from the Internet and contacted the bank.

“I always thought scams happened because people clicked suspicious links.

“I never expected that scammers could take over my phone while I was still holding it.

“By the time you realise it is the work of a scammer, it is too late, as you have probably already suffered financial losses,” he said.

Another victim, who wished to be known as Tan, 56, from Ipoh, said she was contacted through WhatsApp on July 1.

The caller informed her that she had won a RM3,000 prize and was offered a choice between shopping vouchers or cash credited to her e-wallet.

Tan said she opted for a cash reward, and the call was subsequently transferred to a “manager”, who sounded like a foreigner.

“I just followed his instruction to claim the reward.

“He then took control of my phone screen and kept directing me from one site to another without giving me time to think,” she said.

Tan said she then contacted the platform’s customer service through the app, activated the kill switch and lodged a police report within an hour.

She also said the official complaint submitted through the app, together with screenshots and supporting documents, later disappeared from her phone.

Tan claimed that RM4,500 was charged to her pay-later account while another RM6,000 was withdrawn through the platform’s loan facility, bringing her total losses to RM10,500.

“The RM6,000 purported loan was converted into a 24-month repayment plan, requiring a monthly instalment of over RM300.

“The sum of RM4,500 was transferred to an entity listed as ‘Lucky Boy Trading’, although I had not purchased any items,” she said.

A victim from Subang, who identified himself as Ravi, 35, said scammers posing as delivery company employees convinced him to install an application to reschedule a parcel.

After granting the application access to his phone, he noticed that messages and notifications were appearing and disappearing without his involvement.

“I thought I was only following instructions to receive a parcel. I never expected them to be able to take control of my phone.”

Friday, August 7, 2026

When ‘be careful’ is not enough

 

PETALING JAYA: “Be careful.” These are caring words often told to older persons to watch their step.

But fall prevention requires more than simply telling the ­senior citizen to “be careful”, said Prof Dr Tan Maw Pin, a professor in geriatric medicine at Universiti Malaya Medical Centre.

But fall prevention requires more than simply telling the ­senior citizen to “be

Malaysia, she said, has yet to implement a coordinated natio­nal falls prevention strategy despite the National Health and Morbidity Survey 2025 report stating that about 15% of Malaysians aged 60 and above fall at least once a year.

“Getting the statistics is important but it must lead to policy, investment, implementation and evaluation,” she said.

According to the World Health Organization, falls are the second leading cause of unintentional injury deaths worldwide, with adults older than 60 suffering the highest number of fatal falls.

ASLO READ: Easing big fears of small falls with home modifications

Dr Tan said a fall should never be dismissed as a normal part of ageing.

ASLO READ: Easing big fears of small falls with home modifications

Dr Tan said a fall should never be dismissed as a normal part of ageing.

“The likelihood of falling – and of sustaining a serious injury – rises with age, frailty, muscle weakness, osteoporosis and chronic illness.

“A fall may cause a hip fracture, head injury, bleeding or other fractures,” she added.

Dr Tan cautioned that its consequences frequently extend beyond the immediate injury.

“An older person may become afraid of falling again, reduce their activity, lose muscle strength and become increasingly depen­dent.

“Some never regain their previous mobility or indepen­dence,” she explained.

A first fall should be regarded as a warning sign warranting assessment, particularly if it is unexplained or results in injury, Dr Tan noted.

'CLICK TO ENLARGE'
'CLICK TO ENLARGE'

“Anyone who develops loss of consciousness, confusion, severe headache, vomiting, weakness of an arm or leg, inability to stand, severe pain or a suspected fracture after a fall should receive urgent medical attention.

“People taking blood-thinning medication should also be assessed promptly following a head injury, even if they initially appear well,” she added.

Dr Tan also said medication such as sedatives, some antidepressants and certain blood-pressure medicines might cause drowsiness or a sudden drop in blood pressure.

“Eyesight, hearing, foot problems and footwear should also be assessed.”

Dehydration and medication side effects might also precipitate a fall, she said.

“Some falls result from heart rhythm abnormalities or fainting and should not automatically be blamed on ageing or clumsiness,” Dr Tan added.

ASLO READ: Never too late for stronger muscles and safer steps

“Mental and neurological factors are equally relevant. Dementia may affect judgement, attention and awareness of ­hazards.”

She said older folk should exercise regularly to improve muscle strength and balance, adding that this could include supervised strength training, balance exerci­ses or tai chi.

“At home, carers can improve lighting, remove loose rugs and clutter, secure electrical cables, install grab rails in bathrooms, provide non-slip flooring and ensure frequently needed items are within easy reach,” Dr Tan advised.

“Walking aids must be correctly fitted and used consistently. Older people should not feel embarrassed about using a walking stick or frame.”

While Malaysia has made progress in public spaces, Dr Tan said it is not yet consistently age-­friendly.

“Newer facilities may provide ramps, lifts and accessible toilets, but the routes leading to them may still contain broken or uneven pavements, poorly placed drains, slippery surfaces, inadequate lighting or missing handrails,” she said.

Association for Residential Aged Care Operators of Malaysia president Delren Terrence Douglas said many towns and ­cities are still not designed with the needs of senior citizens in mind, making everyday activities such as walking, shopping or visi­ting public parks unnecessarily difficult.

He said in some malls and parks, elderly people often have to keep walking despite feeling tired because there are few places to sit and rest.

“A shortage of benches, handrails and accessible ramps leaves many seniors struggling to complete even short journeys,” he added.

Saturday, August 1, 2026

AI ecosystem to get new legal framework, a pro­posed solu­tion for global AI gov­ernance


 

Governance Bill will not apply to personal use

PETALING JAYA: Artificial intelligence (AI) systems, the AI lifecycle, as well as AI developers and deployers, are set to be regulated under the proposed Artificial Intelligence Governance Bill.

However, the Bill will not apply to the personal use of AI or on matters of national security.

Intended to serve as a national legal framework for the safe, responsible and innovation-enabling use of AI, the law will apply to systems placed on the Malaysian market or put into service in Malaysia.

ALSO READ: Evolving AI could outpace regulation, warn experts

It will also apply to AI systems designed, developed or used here, as well as those used by deployers set up in Malaysia, regardless of where the systems are physically hosted.

The proposed AI Governance Act is guided by five key principles: protecting human dignity and rights, transparency and explainability, accountability, safety and security, and responsible data governance.

Together, these principles provide the foundation for the responsible development, deployment and use of AI systems, while promoting trustworthy AI, innovation and public confidence.

CLICK TO ENLARGE
CLICK TO ENLARGE

According to the public consultation document released by the National AI Office (NAIO), the Bill will adopt a principle-based approach by setting out national AI Governance Principles to guide the responsible development, deployment and use of AI, with implementation supported through standards, guidelines and other instruments.

It also adopts a risk-based approach, with regulatory obligations proportionate to an AI system's level of risk, categorised into three levels: unacceptable, high and low.

This means that higher-risk systems will face stricter governance requirements while lower-risk applications will be subject to lighter obligations.

The risk framework is anchored on “harm”, which includes death, bodily injury, unlawful deprivation of fundamental liberty anchored to the Federal Constitution, and the contravention of any written law.

The Bill also categorise AI incidents to include failures, weaknesses, misuse, unexpected effects and near misses.

It will also require incidents to be reported, including the nature of the incident, its foreseeable harm, the containment measures taken, the root cause (where applicable), and the remediation actions implemented.

The Bill also proposes a central AI authority as the principal national body for AI governance, whose role will be to oversee and operate the national “baseline” principles and standards to strengthen the overall AI ecosystem by addressing gaps in capacity across sectors.

The authority will oversee AI safety by maintaining a risk framework, supervising assessments, supporting testing, developing incident reporting mechanisms and engaging in international technical cooperation.

It will also be responsible for investigations and enforcement, including technical fact-finding when AI incidents occur, determining what happened, identifying the systems and actors involved, as well as producing findings to support corrective actions.

In addition, it will carry out capacity-building functions for the public sector by developing guidance, templates, training and practical support for public authorities, regulators, AI sandbox operators or overseers, and regulated organisations to help them comply with the framework.

The authority may also appoint "Sectoral Leads", who will be delegated specific powers under the Bill to support the implementation of the framework, where they have the legal authority, technical expertise and governance capacity.

The proposed amendments in the document are not final and remain subject to further review and amendment.

Digital Minister Gobind Singh Deo said in June that the government will adopt a two-pronged approach by using existing laws to prosecute those who misuse content, while also drafting the AI Governance Bill to further strengthen prevention and accountability throughout the technology’s lifecycle.

He said the move is aimed at ensuring that risks posed by high-capability technologies such as deepfakes, synthetic content and identity manipulation can be addressed at an early stage.

Ultimately, according to the public consultation document, the Bill aims to set up a central oversight framework that works alongside existing sectoral regulators to enable coordinated governance while addressing industry-specific risks and operational needs.

“This will allow public bodies, including existing regulators, to collaborate within a common governance framework, while retaining the flexibility to address sector-specific risks and operational needs,” it said.

The NAIO will be launched tomorrow.

Related stories:
20 Jul 2026The speech focused on China's governance philosophy of prioritising AI risk prevention and control while advancing secure, controllable, and ...Read more

Wednesday, July 29, 2026

The dollar system and global economic imbalances, Crumbling dollar hegemony

 

Crumbling dollar hegemony.Illustration: Liu Rui/GT

Published: Jul 29, 2026 03:38 PMA narrative has gained traction in recent years that attributes global supply-demand mismatches, trade frictions and growing competitive pressures to expanding industrial supply in emerging markets, particularly what it describes as "China's industrial overcapacity". This argument reverses cause and effect and obscures the deeper issue: the structural flaws of an international monetary system built around the U.S. dollar's dominance.

At the most fundamental macroeconomic level, global imbalances are not primarily an industrial issue, but one rooted in monetary arrangements and balance-of-payments structures. Under the savings-investment identity, a country's current-account balance essentially mirrors the gap between domestic savings and investment. The long-standing global pattern in which deficit countries consume while surplus countries produce is not determined by differences in industrial capacity. It is built into the structure of the dollar-based system.

As the world's dominant reserve and settlement currency, the dollar is subject to the inescapable Triffin dilemma. The U.S. must run persistent current-account deficits to provide the dollar liquidity needed to support international trade, capital flows and foreign-exchange reserves. Much of the dollar-denominated assets accumulated by other countries then flows back into U.S. financial markets, particularly into U.S. Treasury securities. This continually lowers America's overall financing costs and supports persistent fiscal deficits and consumption beyond current means.

This cycle of exporting dollars, importing goods and recycling capital back into the U.S. lies at the heart of global imbalances. It has existed for decades and is not fundamentally linked to the rise of Chinese industry.

Claims that so-called "overcapacity" is disrupting global markets also reveal a clear double standard. The large and persistent trade surpluses generated by Germany's advanced manufacturing sector, Japan's auto industry and U.S. high-tech products are widely viewed as a reflection of international specialization. Yet China's export competitiveness, built on integrated industrial supply chains, cost advantages and technological advances, is characterized as a "market distortion". In reality, the ample supply seen in some Chinese industries stems from persistently weak global demand, shifts in global supply chains and industrialization efforts across countries. It is a consequence of global imbalances, not their cause.

Blaming systemic global imbalances on the industrial capacity of a single country is neither objective nor does it do much to address the problem. Suppressing supply, erecting trade barriers and forcing surplus countries to scale back industrial capacity would only accelerate the fragmentation of global supply chains and further weaken effective global demand.

Addressing the root causes of global economic imbalances requires far-reaching reform of the international financial order.

First, the international monetary system should be further diversified. The global economy should reduce its excessive reliance on a single sovereign currency by expanding the use of the euro, the renminbi and other currencies in cross-border settlement, investment, financing and reserve holdings. Broader use of Special Drawing Rights (SDRs) should also be encouraged to support a more multipolar and balanced monetary system with greater risk diversification.

Second, mechanisms should be established to impose greater discipline on reserve-currency issuers. Global macroeconomic policy coordination should be strengthened to constrain unilateral and aggressive monetary and fiscal policies by major reserve-currency countries and reduce volatility in global capital flows and asset prices resulting from their spillover effects.

Third, the global financial governance architecture should be reformed. Voting shares and governance structures at the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank should be reformed to give emerging markets and developing countries a greater voice. A fairer and more transparent framework for global debt governance and crisis response should also be established.

Fourth, cross-border payment and settlement systems should be diversified. A broader range of cross-border clearing arrangements should be developed to reduce the path dependence of global trade and investment on a single payment system and bolster the resilience of the global financial system.

Global economic imbalances reflect tensions accumulated over a century of globalization and the evolution of the international monetary system. Only by moving beyond the short-sighted approach of blaming supply and shifting responsibility, and by reforming the international financial system toward greater diversity, equality, stability and shared governance, can the world address the underlying pressures behind these imbalances and achieve more balanced and sustainable global economic growth.

Why digital asset fraud victims won’t sue

 

 Photo by DUYET LE on Unsplash

A GUY placed an order for supplies on a foreign website and paid for them in bitcoins.

The shipment never came, he got locked out from his account, and the admin is uncontactable. He wants to sue but worries it’s a lot more hassle than it’s worth.

Disclaimer: What you’re about to read is not legal opinion. If you’re facing a similar transaction, get advice beforehand not after. Had he done this, he wouldn’t be here.

First, he was asked by a lawyer to choose the jurisdiction for his case to be heard, each with its own private laws and civil procedure, as he needs to establish geographic connections like where the goods are based, where the loss occurred, and where the parties are located.

Bitcoins live on the public blockchain that is operated by nearly 20,000 computer nodes scattered worldwide.

Unlike cloud storage where one can pinpoint specific physical server locations where data is kept, each node has a duplicate copy of the bitcoin ledger.

All of this is virtual, hence the paradox: ‘nowhere and everywhere’. Lawyers have a word for it: “omni-territorial”.

The bitcoin wallet he used to make the payment is a browser extension, which could be accessed wherever he’s at with an internet connection.

Same goes for the website domain, hosting service, and InterPlanetary File System gateway, which are foreign. How then is his location of loss determined?

He’s also unsure whether the interface is actually a decentralised application (dApp) that runs by itself. He could have been interacting with a bot all along i.e. there’s no one for him to sue.

Some dApps are set up as decentralised autonomous organisations (DAO); but most jurisdictions don’t recognise DAO as a legal person, which means it cannot enter contracts, own property, and sue or be sued.

So, he’s back to square one: ‘Random Victim vs Persons Unknown’.

Naturally he’d filed a police report. He heard about the recent Cybercrimes Bill which addresses extra-territorial concerns, but for now, time is his biggest enemy.

At this junction, he’d hired an expert to trace the movement of bitcoins in the recipient’s wallet address with a ‘blockchain explorer’ (search engine for crypto activity).

He was told they are parked at a digital asset exchange (DAX) registered to an island somewhere on the Indian Ocean.

He wants to seek urgent interim relief from the court to freeze the funds before they’re dissipated, like how it’s done for bank accounts.

But he only has a lead. He can’t even bring a fully pleaded claim since there’s no information about the name or address of the other party!

He has no choice but to compel the DAX to disclose the name of its customers, even though the DAX is probably just a transit point and an innocent third party who got mixed up in this.

To assist him with such discovery, the court may grant free-standing information orders but they are highly discretionary and rarely used in foreign proceedings; and this is assuming there’s a strong cause of action for the court to assert jurisdiction on his claim.

Then there are service issues, i.e. proper delivery of court documents to the unknown defendant. Some judges allow serving directly to the wallet address with a non-fungible token ( T) that contains hyperlinks to the lawsuit.

But this isn’t always reliable, as the address is anonymous and can only be accurately linked to a human owner if the DAX has verified updated records.

To paraphrase an analogy from Lord Sumption (former Justice of UK Supreme Court): a hit-and-run driver who cannot be identified does not subsequently become identified simply because an T has been nailed to a tree near the scene of crime!

Let’s say he finally gets his way in court, he could still face obstacles with the judgment – will the foreign court recognise it, how to enforce it, are the funds already gone?

Truth be told, there’s a ‘silent majority’ crisis: studies show that 78% of crypto crimes are never escalated to the authorities. Of those that do, just US$1 is recovered for every US$65 lost, though it depends on fraud type and response time (93% don’t even report within 24 hours!).

Less than 6% consult a lawyer, and even far less would end up with civil litigation.

Most victims don’t seek recourse unless the amount of loss is huge because they feel that the legal process is expensive, slow and complex; and is largely designed for prosecution rather than compensation or refund.

But this perpetuates a vicious cycle: there’d be insufficient data points for investigators to develop typologies and for public interest groups to push reform, and courts won’t have the right cases to rule on for precedent – while fraudsters out there continue to get bolder without reprisal.

In the end he decides not to sue. Sorry, there are no heroes in this story.

 


By Edmund Yong is a director of the Generative AI Association of Malaysia and ambassador of the Global Blockchain Business Council founded in Davos.