src='https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js?client=ca-pub-2513966551258002'/> Rightways: One rate for all Infolinks.com, 2618740 , RESELLER

Pages

Share This

Deepseek https://www.deepseek.com/./深度求索 DeepSeek | 深度求索 https://askaichat.app/chat
Showing posts with label One rate for all. Show all posts
Showing posts with label One rate for all. Show all posts

Tuesday, September 29, 2026

Landmark ruling bans unequal fees, One rate for all

ptions

One flat rate for all

Build­ing fees: a new rul­ing by the Fed­eral Court reminds par­cel own­ers of their right to chal­lenge unequal main­ten­ance rates imposed by man­age­ment bod­ies. — AZHAR MAHFOF/The Star

The rights of smal­ler strata par­cel own­ers are now pro­tec­ted based on a court rul­ing that dif­fer­ent rates imposed by JMB are ‘null and void’. Con­sumer groups and strata own­ers hail the decision as a big win for the com­munity and those facing a sim­ilar situ­ation can take legal action.

PETALING JAYA: High-rise liv­ing offers breath­tak­ing views and mod­ern con­veni­ence, but it also comes with a non-nego­ti­able price tag: main­ten­ance fees.

The situ­ation begs the ques­tion: can the man­age­ment body simply decide that some own­ers should pay a dif­fer­ent rate than oth­ers?

A recent court decision involving Hat­ten Square in Melaka has high­lighted the rights of own­ers when it comes to how such charges are determ­ined.

On Sept 8, the Fed­eral Court unan­im­ously dis­missed Hat­ten Square’s man­age­ment cor­por­a­tion’s applic­a­tion for leave to appeal against a Court of Appeal decision con­cern­ing the impos­i­tion of dif­fer­ent main­ten­ance charge rates dur­ing the Joint Man­age­ment Body (JMB) period.

A three-mem­ber bench com­pris­ing Fed­eral Court judges Justices Ahmad Ter­ri­rudin Mohd Salleh, Che Mohd Ruz­ima Ghazali and Col­lin Lawrence Sequerah dis­missed the applic­a­tion with costs of RM50,000 to Brick­works Realty Sdn Bhd.

The decision ends the man­age­ment cor­por­a­tion’s attempt to over­turn a Court of Appeal rul­ing that rein­stated the Strata Man­age­ment Tribunal’s ver­dict, declar­ing the dif­fer­ent rates imposed dur­ing the JMB period “null and void”.

The dis­pute arose from a res­ol­u­tion passed at the JMB’S first annual gen­eral meet­ing (AGM) on April 24, 2021, which imposed dif­fer­ent main­ten­ance charge rates on the retail mall, hotel suites and car park com­pon­ents of the Hat­ten Square mixed devel­op­ment.

Weigh­ing in, law­yer Datuk Joy Wilson Appukut­tan said own­ers in other devel­op­ments may chal­lenge dif­fer­ent main­ten­ance rates imposed by their JMB, fol­low­ing the Fed­eral Court’s decision.

He said the key prin­ciple was that a decision made by own­ers at an AGM could not over­ride the law.

“A JMB AGM can­not pass res­ol­u­tions that are incon­sist­ent with the Strata Man­age­ment Act 2013 (Act 757).

“To do so renders such a res­ol­u­tion null and void,” he said in an inter­view.

Joy said man­age­ment bod­ies that are cur­rently impos­ing dif­fer­ent rates should take steps to reg­u­lar­ise their charges.

“The amount each owner pays is already linked to the share units assigned to their prop­erty, which are determ­ined when a devel­op­ment is divided into indi­vidual units.

“These cal­cu­la­tions take into account factors such as the type, size and char­ac­ter­ist­ics of each prop­erty,” he said.

Strata Own­ers Asso­ci­ation Malay­sia pres­id­ent Datuk Theng Book said the prin­ciple was import­ant because indi­vidual own­ers should not have to com­pete with the fin­an­cial strength or influ­ence of lar­ger par­cel own­ers to have their rights respec­ted.

He said the share-unit sys­tem already con­siders the vari­ous uses of prop­er­ties.

“The major­ity can­not vote to make something law­ful if the law does not per­mit it,” he said.

Law Hock Hua, adviser of the Selangor and Kuala Lum­pur Strata Prop­erty Own­ers Asso­ci­ation, said the decision was sig­ni­fic­ant because there could be a con­sid­er­able imbal­ance between large par­cel own­ers, developers or parties linked to developers and indi­vidual own­ers.

He said a small par­cel owner could be a pen­sioner, retiree, fam­ily mem­ber or small busi­ness owner who might have lim­ited resources to chal­lenge a decision.

“The law should be the equal­iser. It should not mat­ter whether an owner has one small par­cel or con­trols hun­dreds of par­cels.

“The man­age­ment body must oper­ate within the same stat­utory frame­work,” Law said.

He also said an AGM res­ol­u­tion could not over­ride the require­ments of legis­la­tion and that own­ers should not assume something was law­ful simply because it had been approved by a major­ity.     Building fees: A new ruling by the Federal Court reminds parcel owners of their right to challenge unequal maintenance rates imposed by management bodies. — AZHAR MAHFOF/The Star


PETALING JAYA: High-rise living offers breathtaking views and modern convenience, but it also comes with a non-negotiable price tag: maintenance fees.

The situation begs the question: can the management body simply decide that some owners should pay a different rate than others?Advertisement

PlayStream
court decision involving Hatten Square in Melaka has highlighted the rights of owners when it comes to how such charges are determined.

ALSO READ: Smaller strata parcel owners also face challenges

On Sept 8, the Federal Court unanimously dismissed Hatten Square’s management corporation’s application for leave to appeal against a Court of Appeal decision concerning the imposition of different maintenance charge rates during the Joint Management Body (JMB) period.

A three-member bench comprising Federal Court judges Justices Ahmad Terrirudin Mohd Salleh, Che Mohd Ruzima Ghazali and Collin Lawrence Sequerah dismissed the application with costs of RM50,000 to Brickworks Realty Sdn Bhd.

The decision ends the management corporation’s attempt to overturn a Court of Appeal ruling that reinstated the Strata Management Tribunal’s verdict, declaring the different rates imposed during the JMB period “null and void”.

The dispute arose from a resolution passed at the JMB’s first annual general meeting (AGM) on April 24, 2021, which imposed different maintenance charge rates on the retail mall, hotel suites and car park components of the Hatten Square mixed development.

Weighing in, lawyer Datuk Joy Wilson Appukuttan said owners in other developments may challenge different maintenance rates imposed by their JMB, following the Federal Court’s decision.

He said the key principle was that a decision made by owners at an AGM could not override the law.

“A JMB AGM cannot pass resolutions that are inconsistent with the Strata Management Act 2013 (Act 757).

“To do so renders such a resolution null and void,” he said in an interview.

Joy said management bodies that are currently imposing different rates should take steps to regularise their charges.

“The amount each owner pays is already linked to the share units assigned to their property, which are determined when a development is divided into individual units.

“These calculations take into account factors such as the type, size and characteristics of each property,” he said.

Strata Owners Association Malaysia president Datuk Theng Book said the principle was important because individual owners should not have to compete with the financial strength or influence of larger parcel owners to have their rights respected.

He said the share-unit system already considers the various uses of properties.

“The majority cannot vote to make something lawful if the law does not permit it,” he said.

Law Hock Hua, adviser of the Selangor and Kuala Lumpur Strata Property Owners Association, said the decision was significant because there could be a considerable imbalance between large parcel owners, developers or parties linked to developers and individual owners.

He said a small parcel owner could be a pensioner, retiree, family member or small business owner who might have limited resources to challenge a decision.

“The law should be the equaliser. It should not matter whether an owner has one small parcel or controls hundreds of parcels.

“The management body must operate within the same statutory framework,” Law said.

He also said an AGM resolution could not override the requirements of legislation and that owners should not assume something was lawful simply because it had been approved by a majority.

Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!

Others Also Read