src='https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js?client=ca-pub-2513966551258002'/> Rightways Infolinks.com, 2618740 , RESELLER

Pages

Share This

Deepseek https://www.deepseek.com/./深度求索 DeepSeek | 深度求索 https://askaichat.app/chat

Sunday, May 4, 2025

Trump’s tariff fight with Xi reveals China’s great divide

 

Going strong: China has become less reliant on American consumers since Trump’s first trade war in 2018. — Reuters

HOW does an escalating US-China trade war affect people’s well-being? In China, it depends on who you ask.

Some are energised by the fight. Electric-vehicle makers are in hyperdrive, pushing out luxury new models, self-driving features and battery-charging technologies that allow drivers to recharge almost as fast as filling a petrol tank. Instead of selling cars to Americans, the likes of BYD are taking on Tesla in growth regions such as South-east Asia.

There’s also talk of an “engineer dividend” – credit to President Xi Jinping for his focus on higher education in sciences. The success of DeepSeek’s reasoning model, released in late January, gave rise to a realisation that China is not just a manufacturing powerhouse whose status is being challenged by President Donald Trump’s tariffs. Rather, Beijing may have found a fresh growth model. It can grab market share in software services, which the US excels at. Almost every week, Chinese tech firms have been releasing new artificial intelligence models and applications.

In part because of a stock market rebound, luxury home sales in Shanghai are booming. Property markets in tech hubs such as Hangzhou and Shenzhen are also seeing a revival, a welcoming reprieve after a four-year downturn.

After all, China has become less reliant on American consumers since Trump’s first trade war in 2018. Exports to the US accounted for just 15% of the total in 2024, versus 20% a decade earlier. The economy will shrink by only about 3%, even if the entire trading route to the US gets wiped out.

Beneath that stoic defiance, however, are genuine concerns about how to make a living, especially among blue-collar workers. A decline in exports, until now a rare bright spot in an otherwise anaemic economy, will only create more competition for low-skilled jobs. Already, demand for their labour is diminishing due to factory automation and the end of a decade-long property boom. In 2024, the manufacturing and construction sectors absorbed just over 40% of migrant workers, versus more than half a decade earlier.

Apparel is the third-largest category of US imports from China, after communication devices and electronic equipment. On average, the textile industry hires more than 25 people for every one million yuan (RM589, 846) in gross domestic product generated. About 16 million jobs could be lost thanks to Trump’s tariffs, according to Goldman Sachs Group estimates.

What these displaced might do next matters to the rest of the 425 million-strong blue-collar workforce. In recent years, people have been moving in droves into the gig economy, working as housekeepers, drivers, delivery workers and social media influencers.

Already, some of these sectors are getting crowded. In 2024, the number of ride-hailing drivers jumped by 27% to 38 million, prompting some local governments to warn about overcapacity. No surprise, their average monthly pay fell.

Or consider the 18 million social media live streamers, often young people who want glamour in their work. Most of them aren’t getting rich – they are barely getting by. A recent academic survey shows that 93% make less than 3,000 yuan a month, not even half of what an average delivery person earns.

It’s unlikely Beijing will launch the kind of bazooka stimulus witnessed in the aftermath of the global financial crisis (GFC), the last time China’s exports registered double-digit declines. Back then, more than a third of migrant workers, or over 80 million, were employed in manufacturing. The magnitude of job losses was much larger.

Barring mass street protests, the government’s attitude towards blue-collar labourers has been that since many have few skills, they can be flexible. Manufacturing jobs gone? No problem, they can go into the services sector, or back home to the farm. During the GFC, at least 20 million laid-off migrant workers returned to rural areas. This attitude is unlikely to change just because of Trump.

In fact, this trade war only exacerbates a separation of the elite from the grassroots. For the skilled and well-to-do, US tariffs barely touch their lives, and they are thinking of new money-making opportunities now that Trump is tearing up the existing world order (Gold, anyone?). But millions of others are only getting more anxious. – Bloomberg Opinion/TNS

by Shuli Ren, a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Asian markets.

Related posts"

US economy in Q1 shrinks amid new tariff policies; US reportedly actively engaging with China through multiple channels

Close the US military bases in Asia !


Basic reciprocity among the major powers would save trillions of dollars of military outlays over the coming decade, the American economist writes.


Representational image.

President Donald Trump is complaining that US military bases in Asia are too costly for the country, and Japan and Korea should pay for them. Commenting on this on his Substack –Savage Minds – American economist and Columbia University professor Jeffrey D Sachs writes, “Here’s a much better idea: close the bases and return the US servicemen to the US.”

According to Sachs, the US purpose of stationing 50,000 troops in Japan and nearly 30,000 in Korea are not for protecting these countries but for force projection in the region. The only times in the last 1,000 year of Chinese history that China invaded Japan was when the Mongols ruled China briefly, about 700-750 years back.  Japan has a longer and a recent history of invading China.

He further writers that “In 1894-5, Japan invaded and defeated China in the Sino-Japanese war, taking Taiwan as a Japanese colony. In 1931, Japan invaded northeast China (Manchuria) and created the Japanese colony of Manchukuo. In 1937, Japan invaded China, starting World War II in the Pacific region.”

Today nobody believes Japan will invade China. The same is true of China and Korea. During the past 1,000 years, China never invaded Korea, except on one occasion: when the US threatened to attack China.

Sachs writes, “China entered the war in late 1950 on the side of North Korea to fight the US troops advancing northward towards the Chinese border. At the time, US General Douglas MacArthur recklessly recommended attacking China with atomic bombs. MacArthur also proposed to support Chinese nationalist forces, then based in Taiwan, to invade the Chinese mainland. President Harry Truman, thank God, rejected MacArthur’s recommendations.”

Sachs believes that any protection that South Korea needs against North Korea, to be sure, can be achieved far more effectively and credibly through a regional security system, including China, Japan, Russia, North Korea, South Korea, than through the presence of the US…” As he says, “In fact, the US military bases in East Asia are really for the US projection of power, not for the defence of Japan or Korea. This is even more reason why they should be removed.” …

He writes, “The best strategy for the superpowers is to stay out of each other’s lanes...Trump is looking for ways to save money—an excellent idea given that the US federal budget is haemorrhaging 2 trillion dollars a year, more than 6% of US GDP. Closing the US overseas military bases would be an excellent place to start.”

“….with America’s 750 or so overseas military bases in around 80 countries, it’s high time to close these bases, pocket the saving, and return to diplomacy…“You keep your military bases out of our neighbourhood, and we’ll keep our military bases out of yours. Basic reciprocity among the major powers would save trillions of dollars of military outlays over the coming decade and, more importantly, would push the Doomsday Clock back from 89 seconds to nuclear Armageddon,” writes Sachs.

Infographic: US military presence around the world

The US controls about 750 bases in at least 80 countries worldwide and spends more on its military than the next 10 countries combined.


In the early morning hours of August 31, the last American soldiers lifted off from Kabul airport, officially ending the 20-year war in Afghanistan, the longest in US history.

At its peak in 2011, the US had approximately 100,000 troops across at least 10 military bases from Bagram to Kandahar. In total, more than 800,000 US soldiers served in the war according to the Pentagon.

While no US troops remain on the ground today, US President Joe Biden said that his military will continue to conduct air raids against enemy targets from “over-the-horizon” – air missions from a vast network of US bases around the region.

Upwards of 750 US bases around the world

According to David Vine, ​​professor of political anthropology at the American University in Washington, DC, the US had around 750 bases in at least 80 countries as of July 2021.

The actual number may be even higher as not all data is published by the Pentagon.

With 120 active bases, Japan has the highest number of US bases in the world followed by Germany with 119 and South Korea with 73.

US military presence around the world
(Al Jazeera)

Saturday, May 3, 2025

US economy in Q1 shrinks amid new tariff policies; US reportedly actively engaging with China through multiple channels

 

A view of cargo ships at Port Liberty in Bayonne, New Jersey, on April 10, 2025. Photo: VCG


The US economy just had its worst quarter since 2022 as current US administration's significant policy changes unnerved consumers and businesses, the CNN reported.

The US is now actively engaging with China through multiple channels, expressing its hope to engage in negotiations over tariffs issues, according to Yuyuantantian, a social media account affiliated with China Media Group, and Wechat account Niutanqin, on Thursday, citing people familiar with the matter. The sources also revealed to Niutanqin that China believes it is acceptable to have contacts, as China's attitude is consistent and clear: We will fight, if fight we must. Our doors are open, if the US wants to talk. 

Gross domestic product, which measures all the goods and services produced in the economy, registered at an annualized rate of -0.3 percent in the first quarter, the Commerce Department said Wednesday.

That's a sharp slowdown from the fourth quarter's 2.4 percent rate, and much worse than the 0.8 percent rate economists projected.

Consumer spending, which powers about 70 percent of the US economy, slowed sharply in the first quarter to a 1.8 percent rate, down considerably from 4 percent in the prior three-month period. That slowdown was largely due to Americans cutting their spending on goods, and was the weakest rate since mid-2023.

Wednesday's report also showed that inflation took a sharper than expected upswing during the first quarter. The Personal Consumption Expenditures price index rose an estimated 3.6 percent for the quarter, up from 2.4 percent during the fourth quarter, according to the report. Excluding food and energy prices, the core PCE index increased 3.5 percent versus 2.6 percent the quarter before.

The Kobeissi Letter, a financial publication, noted that preliminary GDP growth in the first quarter came in at negative 0.3 percent, below expectations of 0.3 percent. "This marks the lowest and first negative GDP reading since Q2 2022. GDP contraction in the US has begun," according to the Xinhua News Agency,

Niutanqin said that any form of consultation and negotiation must be carried out in an equal manner based on mutual respect. China does not look for trouble, but neither are we afraid of it. Pressure, threats and blackmail are not the right way to deal with China.

There is really no need for China to waste time until the US takes substantial actions. But if the US wishes to engage with China, at this stage, it is not necessarily a bad thing for China either. However, the US shouldn't expect China to make any impossible concessions. Moreover, judging from the current game, China remains calm and clear-headed, always firmly in control of the initiative in both dialogue and confrontation, the Niutanqin said.



Donald Trump-the noisy duck



Xi Jinping - the silent dragon







Friday, May 2, 2025

Covid-19 may have emerged in US first, China issues Covid-19 white paper

Office buildings sit empty in Michigan
BEIJING, April 30 (Reuters) - China restated its case that COVID-19 may have originated in the United States in a white paper on its pandemic response released on Wednesday after President Donald Trump's administration blamed a lab leak in China.
The White House launched a COVID-19 website on April 18 in which it said the coronavirus came from a lab leak in China while criticising former President Joe Biden, former top U.S. health official Anthony Fauci and the World Health Organization.
In the white paper, released by the official Xinhua news agency, China accused the U.S. of politicising the matter of the origins of COVID-19. It cited a Missouri lawsuit which resulted in a $24 billion ruling against China for hoarding protective medical equipment and covering up the outbreak.
China shared relevant information with the WHO and the international community in a timely manner, the white paper said, emphasising that a joint study by the WHO and China had concluded that a lab leak was "extremely unlikely".
The U.S. should not continue to "pretend to be deaf and dumb", but should respond to the legitimate concerns of the international community, the white paper said. - 
Reuters

THE State Council Information Office has issued a white paper titled Covid-19 Prevention, Control and Origins Tracing: China’s Actions and Stance.

Apart from the preface and conclusion, the document contains three chapters: ‘Contributing Chinese Wisdom to the Study of the Origins of SARS-CoV-2,’ ‘China’s Contribution to the Global Fight Against Covid-19,’ and ‘The Mismanaged Response of the US to the Covid-19 Pandemic.’

According to the white paper, since the outbreak of Covid-19, China has consistently dedicated substantial resources to collaborative studies into the origins of the virus, involving both Chinese and international scientists.

Upholding its international responsibilities, the country spearheaded research initiatives in critical fields such as clinical epidemiology, molecular epidemiology, environmental epidemiology and the identification of animal hosts.

China cooperated with the World Health Organisation (WHO) on the study of virus origins with a strong sense of global responsibility and transparency.

The white paper points out that ‘WHO-convened Global Study of Origins of SARS-CoV-2: China Part-Joint WHO-China Study,’ as well as other studies, conducted systematic epidemiological investigations, molecular tracing, animal reservoir screening, and studies on cold-chain pathways, ruled out the possibility of Wuhan being the natural origin of SARS-CoV-2, and concluded that a Wuhan lab leak is extremely unlikely.

China shared the epidemic information with the WHO and the international community in a timely manner, and provided the genome sequence of the virus. 

China also invited WHO international expert missions to conduct joint research into the origins of SARS-CoV-2, shared without reservation its effective measures for prevention, control, diagnosis and treatment and did all it could to provide massive supplies and extensive aid to the international community.

As pointed out in the white paper, the US government, instead of facing squarely its failure in response to Covid-19 and reflecting on its shortcomings, has tried to shift the blame and divert people’s attention by shamelessly politicising SARS-CoV-2 origins tracing.

Substantial evidence suggested the Covid-19 might have emerged in the United States earlier than its officially claimed timeline, and earlier than the outbreak in China.

The United States should respond to the reasonable concern of the international community, and give a responsible answer to the world.

China will continue to work with all nations in advancing global public health and good governance, and contribute more proactively to preventing new infectious diseases in the future. — Xinhua

China releases white paper on Covid-19 prevention, control and origins tracing 

Full text: Covid-19 Prevention, Control and Origins Tracing: China's Actions and Stance 

Related posts:


Searching for Covid-19’s origin




FORT DETRICK, THE UNITED STATES BIOLOGICAL WARFARE LAB IS WHERE
 CORONAVIRUS ORIGINATED