src='https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js?client=ca-pub-2513966551258002'/> Rightways Infolinks.com, 2618740 , RESELLER

Pages

Share This

Deepseek https://www.deepseek.com/./深度求索 DeepSeek | 深度求索 https://askaichat.app/chat

Thursday, July 10, 2025

Govt urged to intervene as new US tariff brings jitters for businesses

 

Trying times: The tariff would significantly impact manufactures like those in Bayan Lepas, Penang. — CHAN BOON KAI/The Star

JOHOR BARU: The 25% tariff imposed by the United States on Malaysia has sent jitters through the manufacturing sector, with many warning of cancelled orders and a potential wave of business closures.

The furniture industry, for one, fears losing business to Vietnam, which faces a 20% tariff, while some other industries are even thinking of relocating.

Malaysian Furniture Council president Desmond Tan said Vietnam, Malaysia’s closest competitor in the global furniture market, produced a similar range of products and targets the same export destinations – especially the United States.

The tariff for Vietnam was reduced to 20% from the original 46%.

“Since the announcement was only made yesterday (Tuesday), it is still too early to gauge the full extent of its impact on order volumes but the council will continue to monitor developments closely,” he said.

Tan said the industry was also being squeezed by rising costs on the domestic front.

“These include the expanded Sales and Service Tax (SST), which now imposes a 5% tax on raw materials and directly drives up production costs. We also face higher labour expenses with the new minimum wage,” he added.

The new Employees Provident Fund contributions for foreign workers would add further strain while fuel and electricity prices had also gone up, he said.

The council is now urging Putrajaya to commence urgent talks with the United States to negotiate a reduction of the tariff.

He also appealed for a rethink on the new taxes and price hikes to lower production costs, and for export incentives to protect jobs.

The United States accounts for 60% of the country’s total furniture exports, totalling RM2.039bil in just the first four months of the year.

Malaysia also exports furniture to Singapore, Australia, Japan and the United Kingdom, among others.

Muar Furniture Association president Steve Ong said the new tariff was a major blow, as Muar supplied more than RM4bil worth of furniture to the United States in 2024.

It made up 67% of Malaysia’s total furniture exports there, he said.

“The 25% tariff will likely lead to clients cancelling orders and local manufacturers scrambling to stay afloat. This is an urgent crisis,” Ong said.

Another industry player urged the government to act swiftly.

“If nothing is done, a globally competitive industry like ours could shrink or even collapse,” said Goh Song Huang.

“At a time like this, we need clear, steady policies and a government that understands and responds to the real pressures we face.”

In Penang, local industries are bracing for reduced demand with some considering relocation.

“Companies in Malaysia may be forced to shift parts of their production to countries with lower tariffs,” said Malaysia Semiconductor Industry Association (MSIA) president Datuk Seri Wong Siew Hai, adding that higher prices driven by import tariffs tend to suppress global demand.

“When the cost of imported goods rises, demand naturally falls. In the end, everyone along the supply chain, especially buyers of raw materials, will be affected,” he said.

Earlier, it was reported that semiconductor exports would be exempt from the tariffs but it is unclear whether exemptions will remain under the new tariff regime.

“Vietnam’s tariff is at 20%, which gives them a pricing advantage. US buyers may look for cheaper alternatives, putting Malaysian exporters at a disadvantage,” he said.

Federation of Malaysian Manufacturing (FMM) Penang chapter chairman Datuk Seri Lee Teong Li said the 25% tariff would significantly impact exporters to the US.

“It’s a substantial amount. For local manufacturers shipping to the US, it will reduce profit margins. Costs will rise, and customers may start sourcing from other suppliers.

“Even when the 24% tariff was announced in April, it was already a heavy blow. We had hoped for a reduction, not an increase,” he said.

He noted that for now, the strategy was to ship out as much as possible before the Aug 1 deadline.

Meanwhile, the Associated Chinese Chambers of Commerce and Industry of Malaysia (ACCCIM) is urging the government to temporarily lower the expanded SST to 4% to ease the financial burden on businesses and preserve Malaysia’s competitive edge.

Its president Datuk Ng Yih Pyng said the government should reduce the expanded SST rate from the current 6%-8% for the first two years of implementation.

He said businesses, already grappling with higher operational costs driven by multiple government-imposed measures, would now have to face the the tariff headwinds and global uncertainties as well.

Source link

https://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2025/07/10/govt-urged-to-intervene-as-new-us-tariff-brings-jitters-for-businesses

Related stories:

UNHRC adopts China-initiated human rights resolution by consensus without a vote for first time

 

A picture taken on January 23, 2024 shows the United Nations Human Rights Council during the review of China’s human rights at the UN Offices in Geneva. Photo: VCG


As the United Nations marks its 80th anniversary in 2025, the 59th session of the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) on Tuesday adopted by consensus a resolution titled "The contribution of development to the enjoyment of all human rights," co-sponsored by China and 40-plus other countries. This is the first time since the resolution in 2017 that it has been adopted by consensus without a vote, the Xinhua News Agency reported on Tuesday. 

Chen Xu, permanent representative of China to the United Nations Office at Geneva and other international organizations in Switzerland, said the resolution reaffirms the vital role of development in ensuring the enjoyment of all human rights, highlights the importance of people-centered, high-quality development in meeting the growing aspirations for a better life and in advancing the full realization of human rights.

Chen expressed hope that the resolution would foster greater consensus and encourage all countries to work with China in prioritizing the future of humanity and the well-being of all nations, revitalizing genuine multilateralism, pursuing high-quality development, and promoting and safeguarding all human rights. 

The resolution reflects the shared aspirations of many developing countries. It was jointly sponsored by 40-plus nations, including Cameroon and Pakistan. Representatives from countries such as Cuba, Bolivia, Ethiopia, and Kenya voiced strong support, noting that the resolution will help raise global awareness of the role of development in promoting human rights and further the cause of human rights protection through sustainable development.

Following its adoption, many countries, including Russia, Brazil, Chile, and the European Union, extended congratulations to China. They recognized China's leadership in advancing the agenda of development-driven human rights at the UNHRC and commended its constructive engagement in crafting a more balanced and impactful resolution text, which has garnered wide recognition and broad international support.
Global Times
Related posts:

Why the cooperative spirit of ‘greater BRICS’ resonates worldwide

RELATED ARTICLES

Malaysia, BRICS and the Global South’s new chapter

 

Rising power: Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim at the BRICS Leaders’ Summit in Rio de Janeiro. Malaysia’s debut on the BRICS stage was an overture with a statement of intent on what’s in the offing going forward. – Bernama

IN Rio de Janeiro this week, something quietly historic unfolded. As the city welcomed leaders for the BRICS Summit, a fresh voice entered the conversation – Malaysia, a newly engaged BRICS partner country and current Chair of Asean. It wasn’t just the setting that was momentous; the substance, too, defied expectations.


Moments after touching down, Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim was ushered on stage alongside President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva to open the BRICS Business Forum. What followed was not the usual speech-reading routine of international summits. Speaking with conviction, Anwar eschewed prepared remarks in favour of an unadorned, impassioned message that electrified the room and drew thunderous, sustained applause.


He delivered an address that was personal and relatable, lucid and uplifting, thanks not just to his oratorical skills but his political astuteness as well. His words, sharp and confident, resonated deeply with the hundreds in attendance in the packed hall.


This was not just Malaysia’s debut on the BRICS stage; it was an overture with a statement of intent on what’s in the offing going forward. At the core of Anwar’s speech was a simple truth – the developing world can no longer be seen as peripheral players in a system built elsewhere. We are rising powers in our own right, armed with moral capital, technological capacity and economic ambition.


This was a forceful expression of global reform. Anwar did not merely speak for Malaysia and Asean. He also articulated for the Global South its pursuit of a more equitable, responsive and plural future.


There was particular praise for Lula, whose principled leadership has steered BRICS beyond

rhetoric into something more consequential – a coalition with real potential to influence global structures. Today’s BRICS, Anwar noted, is not just a forum of statesmen; it includes the voices of the private sector, youth, women and civil society. That gives it a level of resilience, inclusivity and legitimacy that Bretton Woods institutions could not, being weighed down by their hierarchical and opaque structures.


His message marked clarity of purpose with the fine underlying subtleties: Malaysia, and the Global South, too, want to engage all, defer to none, and recast the architecture of global cooperation frameworks from the prism of developing nations. As Chair of Asean, Malaysia brings a regional mandate grounded in multilateralism, economic openness and collective agency.


Anwar addressed Asean’s drive to strengthen intra-regional trade and investment, deepen financial integration, and promote local currencies for cross-border transactions

towards a more stable, diversified system that’s less dollar-dependent. Building on this vision, the BRICS private sector could push innovative frameworks in finance via green

nd sukuk, among others, as levers for systemic transformation.


In his interventions at the Leaders’ Summit, Anwar made a strong case for closer BRICSASEAN ties. Both reflect the ambitions of the Global South, not to disrupt global order but to rebalance it. As economic bifurcation deepens and supply chains collapse, this dialogue helps to rebuild connectivity, fortify inter-regional trade and investment, and enhance collaboration on sectors that matter.


Anwar called for reform of the major postwar institutions, such as the United Nations, IMF, World Bank and WTO, in order to reflect the 21st-century world. The existing multilateral architecture is fraying not for lack of ideals but of responsiveness and the failure to evolve.


On the notion that Malaysia’s partnership with BRICS is demonstrative of a geoeconomic deflection from the West, particularly the United States, Anwar has made it unequivocally clear that the US remains Malaysia’s top source of foreign direct investment. In terms of trade, the US continues to be Malaysia’s third-largest trading partner, a position it has consistently held since 2015, with total bilateral trade exceeding Rm320bil in 2024. Thus, any suggestion of a shift is groundless.


That said, BRICS represents not a counterweight but a counterproposal deeply rooted in inclusion, equity, and shared sovereignty. It embodies a vision of balanced multilateralism that is networked, adaptive, and genuinely plural, offering an alternative framework better attuned to the complexities of a multipolar world.


What we saw in Rio was not a symbolic appearance – it was Malaysia stepping into a new role as bridge-builder, regional convenor, and vocal proponent of a more equitable global economy. And BRICS 2025 could well be a turning point.


The path forward is clear – not a retreat from the multilateral order but its reform; not a rejection of global engagement but its redistribution; not a rivalry of blocs but a realignment of priorities. In Rio, Malaysia asserted a new kind of agency – confident, constructive and forward-looking. The legacy of this moment will be written in the institutions reformed, partnerships forged, and futures enabled.

Malaysia, BRICS and the Global South’s new chapter
– Bernama
Rising power: Prime Minister datuk seri anwar Ibrahim at the BRICS leaders’ summit in Rio de Janeiro. Malaysia’s debut on the BRICS stage was an overture with a statement of intent on what’s in the offing going forward.

IN Rio de Janeiro this week, something quietly historic unfolded. As the city welcomed leaders for the BRICS Summit, a fresh voice entered the conversation – Malaysia, a newly engaged BRICS partner country and current Chair of Asean. It wasn’t just the setting that was momentous; the substance, too, defied expectations.


Moments after touching down, Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim was ushered on stage alongside President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva to open the BRICS Business Forum. What followed was not the usual speech-reading routine of international summits. Speaking with conviction, Anwar eschewed prepared remarks in favour of an unadorned, impassioned message that electrified the room and drew thunderous, sustained applause.


He delivered an address that was personal and relatable, lucid and uplifting, thanks not just to his oratorical skills but his political astuteness as well. His words, sharp and confident, resonated deeply with the hundreds in attendance in the packed hall.

\

This was not just Malaysia’s debut on the BRICS stage; it was an overture with a statement of intent on what’s in the offing going forward. At the core of Anwar’s speech was a simple truth – the developing world can no longer be seen as peripheral players in a system built elsewhere. We are rising powers in our own right, armed with moral capital, technological capacity and economic ambition.


This was a forceful expression of global reform. Anwar did not merely speak for Malaysia and Asean. He also articulated for the Global South its pursuit of a more equitable, responsive and plural future.


There was particular praise for Lula, whose principled leadership has steered BRICS beyond

rhetoric into something more consequential – a coalition with real potential to influence global structures. Today’s BRICS, Anwar noted, is not just a forum of statesmen; it includes the voices of the private sector, youth, women and civil society. That gives it a level of resilience, inclusivity and legitimacy that Bretton Woods institutions could not, being weighed down by their hierarchical and opaque structures.


His message marked clarity of purpose with the fine underlying subtleties: Malaysia, and the Global South, too, want to engage all, defer to none, and recast the architecture of global cooperation frameworks from the prism of developing nations. As Chair of Asean, Malaysia brings a regional mandate grounded in multilateralism, economic openness and collective agency.


Anwar addressed Asean’s drive to strengthen intra-regional trade and investment, deepen financial integration, and promote local currencies for cross-border transactions

towards a more stable, diversified system that’s less dollar-dependent. Building on this vision, the BRICS private sector could push innovative frameworks in finance via green

nd sukuk, among others, as levers for systemic transformation.


In his interventions at the Leaders’ Summit, Anwar made a strong case for closer BRICSASEAN ties. Both reflect the ambitions of the Global South, not to disrupt global order but to rebalance it. As economic bifurcation deepens and supply chains collapse, this dialogue helps to rebuild connectivity, fortify inter-regional trade and investment, and enhance collaboration on sectors that matter.


Anwar called for reform of the major postwar institutions, such as the United Nations, IMF, World Bank and WTO, in order to reflect the 21st-century world. The existing multilateral architecture is fraying not for lack of ideals but of responsiveness and the failure to evolve.


On the notion that Malaysia’s partnership with BRICS is demonstrative of a geoeconomic deflection from the West, particularly the United States, Anwar has made it unequivocally clear that the US remains Malaysia’s top source of foreign direct investment. In terms of trade, the US continues to be Malaysia’s third-largest trading partner, a position it has consistently held since 2015, with total bilateral trade exceeding Rm320bil in 2024. Thus, any suggestion of a shift is groundless. 


That said, BRICS represents not a counterweight but a counterproposal deeply rooted in inclusion, equity, and shared sovereignty. It embodies a vision of balanced multilateralism that is networked, adaptive, and genuinely plural, offering an alternative framework better attuned to the complexities of a multipolar world.


What we saw in Rio was not a symbolic appearance – it was Malaysia stepping into a new role as bridge-builder, regional convenor, and vocal proponent of a more equitable global economy. And BRICS 2025 could well be a turning point.


The path forward is clear – not a retreat from the multilateral order but its reform; not a rejection of global engagement but its redistribution; not a rivalry of blocs but a realignment of priorities. In Rio, Malaysia asserted a new kind of agency – confident, constructive and forward-looking. The legacy of this moment will be written in the institutions reformed, partnerships forged, and futures enabled.