src='https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js?client=ca-pub-2513966551258002'/> Rightways: Education Infolinks.com, 2618740 , RESELLER

Pages

Share This

Deepseek https://www.deepseek.com/./深度求索 DeepSeek | 深度求索 https://askaichat.app/chat
Showing posts with label Education. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Education. Show all posts

Sunday, May 18, 2025

Vaping their way to drugs, dangerous

 

Pocket size: Widely available, small, colourful vape devices are also easy to conceal. — File photo

A DECADE ago, when e-cigarettes, or vapes, landed on our shores, tobacco cessation experts cautioned that the devices could be a gateway to smoking, and a threat to Malaysia’s goal of becoming a smoke-free nation.

Today, the fear is that vapes are luring teens to drugs, creating a generation addicted to substances even more dangerous than nicotine, Monash University Malaysia associate professor and KPJ Puteri Hospital consultant Dr Anne Yee told StarEdu.

Dr Yee, who is also a Universiti Malaya Centre of Addiction Sciences (UMCAS) adjunct professor and Addiction Medicine Association of Malaysia (AMAM) honorary secretary, said unregulated vape liquids are increasingly being mixed with unknown substances, making them more dangerous and addictive.

Vaping nicotine, Dr Yee noted, increases the likelihood of trying other addictive substances, including cannabis and illicit drugs.

Early exposure to nicotine primes the brain for further drug experimentation​, she said.

“Many vape products contain high levels of nicotine, increasing the risk of long-term addiction.

“The earlier a person starts using nicotine, the greater the risk of developing substance use disorders later in life,” she said, adding that vapes have been found to contain illicit substances such as THC, synthetic cannabinoids, or opioids (see infographic), which increase the risk of addiction, toxic chemical exposure, and the risk of respiratory and neurological damage.

“Youths may unknowingly inhale these dangerous substances as unregulated vape products are widely available online – especially social media,” she said.

Narcotic Addiction Rehabilitation Centre (Puspen) Karangan director Zuraidah Ayob said most of the teens at the facility get stuck on drugs through vaping.

“It’s very worrying because the numbers are increasing.

“During one visit to a school in Kuala Lumpur, I asked the 200 students gathered how many of them vaped. A quarter raised their hands. Those were the ones who admitted but imagine how many others who were afraid to raise their hands?” she said, adding that when vape was introduced, it was promoted as a healthier alternative to smoking but the vapour is not safe.

Most vapes contain nicotine levels that are higher than cigarettes, she said.

“Teens are getting hooked without even realising it because they see it as a trend rather than a high risk habit.

“Vape is a gateway to drugs and if not curtailed through education, enforcement and parental or community intervention, we will create a generation that is highly vulnerable to drug abuse,” she concluded.

Note: The Puspen Karangan school is in need of reading materials for its library, as well as volunteers to conduct tuition classes, skills training and motivational talks for its students. Companies interested in assisting as part of their corporate social responsibility programmes, or non-governmental organisations involved in education, may contact the school at zuraidah@aadk.gov.my or pengarah_karangan@aadk.gov.my

CLICK TO ENLARGECLICK TO ENLARGE

CLICK TO ENLARGECLICK TO ENLARGE

‘Mushrooms’ in our midst

Determined to turn over a new leaf, these students will sit for their Sijil Pelajaran Malaysia (SPM) exams this year at the country’s first Puspen school in Karangan, Kedah.

A typical day for these students starts at 9am and ends at 4.30pm. In between lessons at the school, which opened in December last year, co-curricular activities like computer classes are conducted, with students given a two-and-a-half-hour break for lunch.

In an exclusive interview with StarEdu, these students share how curiosity and friends led them to “magic mushrooms”.

Vaping, they say, should be banned because illegal substances are so easily available.

I was introduced to ‘mushrooms’ three years ago by a friend. Before I knew it, I was spending more than RM20 daily to feed my addiction. I got the liquid from a dealer and added it to my vape. The high would hit within five to 10 seconds, and I’d start to feel calm. Soon, I began feeling scared because the drug caused me to overthink. It slowed down my brain, and I was always forgetting stuff. I really regret trying it – if not for my curiosity, I wouln’t be here today. I hope vaping will be banned because many are abusing it. I want to continue my studies if I pass the SPM.

– Salman, 17, Selangor

CLICK TO ENLARGECLICK TO ENLARGEI used to take pil kuda (yaba pill) to give me energy when I worked in the paddy fields. I could not sleep at night so I turned to vaping ‘mushrooms’. I started when I was 13. My friend told me it would help with my insomnia and soon I was hooked. It’s only RM1 per drop and it is very easy to buy. Usually I would buy 10 drops and when I had some money, I would get a bottle for RM150, which could last me a week. It didn’t affect my studies because I was already skipping school anyway, but because I had been playing truant, my school called AADK. I was picked up and my urine test came back positive. It would be good to ban vaping because it is so easy to consume drugs with the device. No one will know. There is no smell at all. Please do not try it because when you are experiencing withdrawal, you really lose all control. I don’t crave it anymore, though sometimes I still have trouble sleeping.

– Kamal, 16, Terengganu

I am here because of ‘mushrooms’ introduced by friends. I was spending about RM700 and above per month on vaping. I come from a well-to-do family. My pocket money was RM40 daily. Sometimes I got more if I helped my mum, so I could save up to RM70 per day. If I had extra, I’d buy a bottle of mushroom liquid, which cost between RM90 and RM150. It’s widely available on social media. The first time I tried it, I thought, “Best le”. I felt happy – always laughing. I tried it for fun and was hooked for three years. I started with a little bit – over time, I felt I couldn’t do without it, so I was vaping 24 hours a day. I needed it as soon as I woke up. It interrupted my studies. I felt ‘heavy’ and couldn’t do anything. Many of my friends used it but I usually vaped alone or with my twin brother. He stopped a little bit earlier than me. I ‘kantoi’ last year during Raya. My mum woke me up on the morning of Raya and asked me to take a bath but I couldn’t wake up. She was angry and started scolding me. My brother came in and saw my vape. He knew what had happened. He asked me if it was ‘mushroom’ but I denied it. He didn’t believe me and tried it. He ended up losing consciousness. He woke up six hours later and couldn’t remember a thing. He told my mum. My mum gave me many chances until finally, the school found out and contacted AADK. Now, I am determined to do my best because in Puspen, the education is good – especially the aspects of religion and discipline. After SPM, I want to be a pilot but I wear specs so that may not be possible. If I can’t achieve what I want, I will continue my mum’s business as taukeh canteen. My first time trying drugs was through vape. It is so cheap and easy to buy. It should be banned. Please don’t be like me. You will ‘gian’ after the first try and it will be hard to stop.

– Adam, 17, Pahang

I don’t even drink alcohol but I started vaping in Form One and was introduced to meth and weed vape liquids. My friend said I would feel high so I wanted to try – 1ml was only RM30. One bottle was RM150. We would pool our money and share one bottle. Usually when I was high, my eyes would turn red but if I took too much, I got sleepy. For the longest time, no one knew. Every 30 minutes I would need to vape. The first time I tried, I felt nothing. And then I got addicted. I’d just spend my days sleeping. For three years, my mum tried to advise me but I couldn’t stop. This year is my SPM year, so she wants me to sit for the exams at Puspen. I am not angry with my mum for sending me here but I am sad. I know it’s for my own good. Now, I feel prepared for my SPM. Every two weeks, my parents will visit. If I could do things all over again, I would never touch this. No more drugs. I didn’t take drugs because of family problems. It was because of friends. I am an only child. My mother cried so many times. I felt so sad because I kept repeating my mistake. Even one drop can change your future. Just don’t try. The negative things that come with one try is not worth it. I want to be a policeman but I am scared that after this, I won’t get a chance. If I cannot join the force, I want to study to be a vet.

– Raghu, 17, Penang

I was always lazy to go to school – ‘kuat ponteng’ since Form Two. I had some issues at home. I got hooked on drugs at 17. It all started with normal vape until my friend introduced me to liquids with drugs. ‘Gian I kuat’ and I couldn’t stop. I couldn’t sleep because there was a lot on my mind. So I would vape before going to sleep. I was working part-time at a food stall. When I vaped, I couldn’t work. I felt lazy. Eventually, my boss found out. I ‘kantoi’ with mum. I was always sleeping and she suspected something was amiss. I used to also pace a lot and could not sit still. I was always dizzy. When my mum asked what’s wrong, I did not tell her. I tried to stop but I kept going back. I used ‘mushroom’ and would spend about RM10 to RM20 a day. I bought it from a friend. I really want to change. I want to get a good job and make my mum happy. When she sent me here, my mum told me to take care of myself and study properly. After my SPM, I want to take up vocational skills – to be an electrician. I am now focused on memorising my lessons for the SPM. School is good so far. I hope youths like me will be more selective when making friends. Avoid people who introduce you to bad things. Stay far, far away because once you start, it’s hard to stop.

– Amin, 19, Kedah

I’m the third of five siblings. When I was in Year One, my parents divorced. I could not accept that my father had remarried. My mum suffered from mental illness. I was Form One when I started vaping ‘mushrooms’. Before that, I was smoking cannabis for five years. Two years ago, my friend let me try ‘mushrooms’ with vape. Then I started using pil kuda together with the mushroom liquid. I had registered to sit for the SPM then but because I was high and hallucinating from ‘mushrooms’, I got into an accident and dropped out of school. I am excited to sit for my SPM this year because I have never been out of my home state. I entered Puspen unprepared but I have tried by best to face it. From my heart, I want to tell students like me – if you have girlfriend problems or whatever, don’t turn to drugs. You don’t need this in your life. I turned to drugs because I was disappointed with my girlfriend and family. When I was high, my family became like my enemy – I was aggressive with my parents. I just wanted money from them. I didn’t realise what I was doing. I would snatch money from my mum when she did not want to give it willingly. I couldn’t control my emotions and now I am here. My family finally put me here because they knew I was hanging out with the wrong crowd. I have been here for 11 months. My body is full of toxins now - pumped with drugs. I am learning to accept that I am an addict. I cannot go home because if I do, I will definitely go back to my friends. After SPM, the first thing I want to do is hug my mum and apologise to her because I spent this Raya without my family. I want to say thank you to my mum for everything and I want to make her proud of me. Even though society will always see the word ‘penagih’ stamped on my forehead, I will always try to make my mother proud – with everything that I have. I understand now my mum is sick, so as a son, I must try to move forward - away from the past hurt, and make her proud.

– Shukri, 19, Terengganu

*Names have been changed to protect the identities of the students.

 

CLICK TO ENLARGECLICK TO ENLARGE

CLICK TO ENLARGECLICK TO ENLARGE

Source link


Related stories:


15 hours ago — Today, the fear is that vapes are luring teens to drugs, creating a generation addicted to substances way more dangerous than nicotine.
Missing: pressreader ‎| Show results with: pressreader



Friday, May 9, 2025

‘Specialists needed in all areas’

 Stakeholders say key obstacles remain in increasing numbers in the country

More needed: As of last year, about 8,000 specialists were employed by the Health Ministry. Stakeholders, however, say there is an urgent need to increase that number especially in fields like cardiothoracic surgery and emergency medicine. — MUHAMAD SHAHRIL ROSLI/The Star

PETALING JAYA: The persistent shortage of medical specialists in the country needs to be urgently addressed, say stakeholders.

With the Health Ministry’s target of 28,000 specialists by 2030 looking increasingly unattainable, they say there is a need to increase the number, especially in fields such as cardiothoracic surgery and emergency medicine.

ALSO READ: Increase training capacity to resolve shortage, say experts

As it stands, there are about 9,000 specialists serving in the Health Ministry.

President of the College of Emergency Physicians at the Academy of Medicine Datuk Dr Alzamani Mohammad Idrose voiced concern over the lack of emergency physicians (EP) in the country.

He said Malaysia falls short of international benchmarks, having only one EP per 50,000 people, compared to the global standard of one per 20,000.

“The ideal EP-to-patient ratio in emergency departments is 1:3,000, as seen in developed countries like Australia and Canada. Singapore maintains a ratio of 1:2,500, whereas Malaysia’s stands at 1:5,000,” he added.

In March, the College of Emergency Physicians, in a statement, emphasised the critical role EPs play in healthcare systems, noting their expertise in addressing emergency medical issues across all disciplines.

“EPs are not only clinicians but also leaders, educators and advocates who strive to improve patient outcomes and strengthen health systems globally,” the college said.

The statement also outlined the roles played by EPs, such as managing emergencies from various disciplines, including heart attack, stroke, diabetic ketoacidosis and renal failure, as well as ensuring systematic triage for critical, semi-critical and non-critical cases.

The statement added that certain EPs develop subspecialities through additional training in areas like Emergency Critical Care, Trauma, Pre-hospital Care, Disaster Medicine, Toxicology and Paediatrics Emergency Medicine.

To increase the number of specialists, including EPs, Dr Alzamani suggested extending local specialisation programmes to more public universities beyond the current four: Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM), Universiti Malaya (UM), Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM) and Universiti Teknologi Mara (UiTM).

Malaysian Association for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery honorary secretary Prof Dr John Chan Kok Meng said there is a need to increase specialists in all areas.

“While those addressing life-saving conditions are crucial, specialists who manage risk factors for severe conditions are equally important,” he said when contacted yesterday.

Based on the association’s workforce planning and projections for cardiothoracic surgery, Chan said more than 40 additional cardiothoracic surgeons are needed in the next five years.

“Our projections indicate we can meet the necessary number of cardiothoracic surgeons to manage existing centres by 2027. However, additional specialists will be needed if the number of centres increases,” he added.

However, he noted some key obstacles in specialist training.

The 14 newly-qualified cardiothoracic surgeons from 2022-2024 are yet to be registered as specialists by the Malaysian Medical Council, pending the enforcement of the amended Medical Act 1971, which Parliament passed last year.

Dr Chan also noted the limitations in training new surgeons.

“An experienced cardiothoracic surgeon can train only one or two doctors at a time. This involves imparting technical surgical skills, supervising surgeries and transferring clinical knowledge and judgment,” he said.

The Health Ministry had, last month, announced several initiatives to address the shortfall of specialists, including the restructuring of medical officer positions and creating a parallel pathway programme.

Another discipline where a shortage of specialists has been reported is the field of oncology, where ministry data showed there were only about 175 cancer specialists in the country.

Severe shortage of specialists have also been reported in the fields of forensic pathology, family medicine, urology, general surgery, paediatric surgery, plastic surgery, neurosurgery and psychiatry among others.

Deputy Health Minister Datuk Lukanisman Awang Sauni had said that Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim’s approval to add 800 specialists annually since 2023 could help meet the demand for medical specialists.

“At the same time, we have also amended the Medicines Act 1971 by creating a parallel pathway programme to create more specialists through this alternative route.

“Currently, we have around 692 specialists using the parallel pathway and also 6,211 medical officers undergoing specialist training,” said Lukanisman.

Source link


Fresh graduates & experienced Nurses in all areas are encouraged to apply - On job training will be provided - Relevant post-basic certificate will be an ..

Monday, May 5, 2025

Brain drain in the USA, ‘America First,’ science on the sidelines?

Trump cutbacks force scientists to increasingly seek jobs in Europe

Student workers of Columbia union members protest Columbia University's recent policy changes and call for protection of international students, restoration of funding, and academic freedom at Columbia University in New York City, US, on March 24, 2025. Photo: IC

David Die Dejean is passionate about studying tuna. Last year, he landed a dream job at National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration in Miami to pursue his research.

By January, he was settled in, had received a good review and loved working with his colleagues, he said.

Then in mid-february he received an email to vacate the premises within 90 minutes. He and hundreds others had been dismissed in job cuts targeting probationary workers as US President Donald Trump’s new administration began slashing funding for universities and research bodies.

Now Die Dejean is applying for positions in Europe.

“I want to work wherever they allow me to do the research,” said the scientist, who studies fish stocks to ensure tuna is being fished sustainably.

“I’m eagerly waiting for some of the things that are coming from the European Union... increasing the opportunities for scientists like me to come back,” said Die Dejean, who was born in Spain but has spent most of his career in the United States and Australia.

Trump’s administration says billions of dollars in cuts are needed to curb the federal deficit and bring the US debt under control.

His cutbacks on research come amid a broader clash that has seen Trump criticise universities as discriminatory for their diversity policies and denounce what he sees as a failure by some institutions to protect Jewish students from antisemitism.

The threat to academics’ livelihoods at universities including Yale, Columbia and Johns Hopkins has given Europe’s political leaders hope they could reap an intellectual windfall.

A letter, reviewed by Reuters, signed in March by 13 European countries including France, Germany and Spain, urged the EU Commission to move fast to attract academic talent.

The European Research Council, an EU body that finances scientific work, told Reuters it would double the relocation budget for funding researchers moving to the EU to €2mil (Rm10mil) per applicant. That goes towards covering the cost of moving to a European institution, which may involve setting up a laboratory.

In Germany, as part of coalition talks for a new government, conservatives and Social Democrats have drawn up plans to lure up to 1,000 researchers, according to negotiation documents from March seen by Reuters that allude to the upheaval in US higher learning.

Reuters spoke to 13 European universities and research institutes that reported seeing an increase in Us-based employees considering crossing the Atlantic, as well as half a dozen Us-based academics pondering a move to Europe.

“Regulatory uncertainty, funding cuts, immigration restrictions, and diminished international collaboration create a perfect storm for brain drain,” said Gray Mcdowell of US digital consultancy firm Capgemini Invent.

A White House official said the administration is analysing research grants and prioritising funding for areas likely to deliver returns for taxpayers “or some sort of meaningful scientific advancement”. The NOAA cuts were designed to avoid compromising its ability to do its duties, the official added.

Pulling in US talent to Europe requires more than good will though. It requires money.

For decades, Europe has lagged far behind the United States on investment in its seats of higher learning. Total expenditure on research and development in the EU among businesses, governments, universities and private non-profit organisations in 2023 was €381bil, according to the latest figures by Eurostat – the statistical office of the European Union.

That same year, total research and experimental development in the United States was estimated at Us$940bil, according to the National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics, a federal agency that provides data on the performance of science and engineering in the United States.

And while the US’S richest university, Harvard, has an endowment worth Us$53.2bil that of Britain’s wealthiest, Oxford, is only £8.3bil.

One academic and an expert in academia said, even with a concerted and substantial effort, Europe would likely need a long time to overturn that spending advantage.

The White House official said even with the cuts, the United States would still account for the most global research funding, adding: “Europe is not going to and cannot fill the void.”

Dozens of scientists have taken to social media encouraging peers to stay in the United States, while others acknowledge a number of drawbacks may deter them from moving.

Michael Olesen, director of an infection prevention programme for a healthcare system in Washington, said language barriers were one potential drawback, as were unfamiliar laws and employment practices.

Salary is another. “My impression is that I would get paid a lot less as an anaesthesiologist in Europe,” said Holden K. Groves, an Assistant Professor of Anaesthesiology at Columbia University, which received funding from the National Institutes of Health (NIH). “It’s a huge ordeal to change.”

Still, Europe’s political leaders feel the stance of the Trump administration has put the wind in their sails.

“The American government is currently using brute force against the universities in the United States, so that researchers from America are now contacting Europe,” Germany’s chancellor-in-waiting, Friedrich Merz, said this month.

“This is a huge opportunity for us.” John Tuthill, a American neuroscience professor at the University of Washington in Seattle, is assessing his options.

He cannot apply for new funding to plan beyond 2027 because grant applications have now been frozen.

The lab of 17 people he runs gets about three-quarters of its funding from the NIH, where the Trump administration has earmarked major cuts.

“Europe is the obvious one, because it is the other hub of biomedical research in the world,” said Tuthill, adding he is weighing up a move with his wife and daughter.

Aix Marseille University in France said it had received interest from 120 researchers at institutions in the United States, including NASA and Stanford, for a €15mil “safe space for science” programme launched on March 7. The initiative aims to attract US staff from fields including health, LGBT+ medicine, epidemiology and climate change.

“Our colleagues were frightened... It was our duty to rise to the occasion,” university director Eric Berton said, noting 10 European universities have contacted him about launching similar programmes.

In the Netherlands, the government wants to establish a fund to attract top foreign scientists and bolster the EU’S ‘strategic autonomy’ aims, Education Minister Eppo Bruins said in a letter.

That marks a policy shift as the government had previously announced plans to cut half a billion euros in research and higher education.

Eindhoven Tech University President Robert-jan Smits told Reuters that bringing in US scientists could boost Europe’s technological sovereignty in areas like semiconductors.

Belgium’s sister universities Vrije Universiteit Brussel and Universite Libre de Bruxelles have launched a scheme encouraging Us-based researchers to apply for 36 postdoctoral positions. And the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation, which promotes the exchange of top scientists to Germany, plans to increase its programmes by about 20%.

The Grantham Institute at Imperial College London, which specialises in climate change research, is creating at least two more research fellowship posts for early-career climate researchers from the United States and has already seen an clear uptick in applications, said its Director of Research, Joeri Rogelj..- Reuters

America First,' science on the sidelines?: US-China ...


OPINION / VIEWPOINT
‘America First,’ science on the sidelines?: US-China-Europe expert dialogue
Published: Apr 24, 2025 10:28 PM
Student workers of Columbia union members protest Columbia University's recent policy changes and call for protection of international students, restoration of funding, and academic freedom at Columbia University in New York City, US, on March 24, 2025. Photo: IC

Student workers of Columbia union members protest Columbia University's recent policy changes and call for protection of international students, restoration of funding, and academic freedom at Columbia University in New York City, US, on March 24, 2025. Photo: IC


Editor's Note:


In recent years, the US has faced unprecedented challenges to its ability to attract top global talent. The "brain drain" in the field of scientific research has been frequently discussed in the media and academia, especially under the current US administration's "America First" policy. The Global Times brings together three experts from China, the US and Europe to discuss how Washington's policy is driving away scientists and its impact on the US' research ecosystem, global talent mobility as well as the future of the global competition in scientific research.

Anthony Moretti, associate professor at the Department of Communication and Organizational Leadership at Robert Morris University

History reminds us that one reason to account for America's prestigious position in areas such as science is that it consistently opened its arms to researchers across the world. Likewise, immigration policies that welcomed such scholars ensured that the US benefited from intellectual firepower whether it was created at home or brought in from elsewhere. Now, America risks suffering from brain drain.

How is it possible that the US, the mythical land of the free, is now a place some scholars want to flee?

Through its insistence that too many colleges and universities are dedicated to "woke" policies and practices and its equally corrosive threats to take away critical grant money, the administration is making it harder and harder for researchers at America's most exceptional institutions to do their jobs. Those with the scholarship or research records that allow them to consider non-US universities are looking elsewhere. Why risk watching decades of work be destroyed?

Many scholars look at the federal government's determination to deport foreign-born graduate students and cannot help but wonder if faculty will be next. Granted, the courts might step in and make it harder for the government to kick international graduate students out of the country. But who could blame a foreign-born researcher for thinking that the courts could decide instead to endorse the president's plans? Why risk deportation?

Do enough people in Washington, and more specifically at the White House, understand the ramifications of losing some of the most intelligent people currently living in the country? US citizens are often told that their country's freedoms explain why millions of people, including the most educated, from across the globe want to live and work in America. That story now rings hollow. Over the past few decades, the US built the largest innovation engine the world has ever seen, but that engine risks short-circuiting.


Li Zheng, research fellow at the Institute of American Studies, China Institutes of Contemporary International Relations

In the post-World War II era, the US built an unrivaled innovation system with its open policies and abundant funding, attracting top talents from around the world. However, this long-standing position is being challenged as recent "America First" policies have created obstacles to continued progress.

For a long time, the US innovation system has been highly dependent on government strategic guidance, diverse teams and overseas scientists. The government has guided the scientific research system through many organizations, such as the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the National Science Foundation, to explore the best path. The relative transcendence and independence of scientific research institutions also allow scientists to focus their own research areas and make freer choices. Besides, foreign scientists have been the mainstay of the US innovation system, allowing it to continue to gather the world's best talents.

However, the current US administration's science policy has brought harm to the US science, technology and innovation system in three ways. First, research and development funding has shrunk dramatically, with many scientific research organizations being the focus of budget cuts and layoffs. Second, the research climate in the country has been politicized. Third, the US has become more inward-looking and xenophobic in terms of scientific and technological exchanges.

Together, these have put the US science, technology and innovation system at risk of a historic setback. As the US risks losing its researchers more and more, the world isn't stopping. Europe and Canada are welcoming US scientists who want to run away from the country with open arms. Thirteen European governments asked the EU to welcome "brilliant talents from abroad who might suffer from research interference and ill-motivated and brutal funding cuts," while Canada has already become the destination for US scientists who have been laid off and are considering running away. Washington's decision to move against the science and technological development has also given more Asian countries a chance to catch up. China, South Korea and Singapore are investing more in R&D and building world-class research infrastructures. These countries may replace the US as a pole of global science and technology innovation in the future.


Sebastian Contin Trillo-Figueroa, a geopolitics analyst from Spain with a specialization in EU-Asia relations

The Trump administration's policies toward science have researchers witness a core civil right vanishing at speed. As a result, many conclude their work is at risk; and that they could pursue it more freely elsewhere.

Yet it's important to recognize that US researchers remain the best-paid in the world, with access to unmatched research funding. Their decision to leave, despite such advantages, underscores the scale of discontent.

This could have a severe negative effect on the US' scientific and tech development and innovation. First, US scientific leadership is now exposed to internal political turbulence in a way not seen before. Second, allies may begin to sever their reliance on US-based research, while the erosion of institutions like NIH weakens US influence in global science diplomacy. Third, the US may serve as a cautionary tale, demonstrating how easy it is to lose global talent, rather than attract it.

The deeper concern for the US may not be technological decline alone, but a fracture between national identity and its scientific community. Researchers, like many immigrants today, may come to believe the so-called American Dream no longer exists.

The outflow of US-based scientists redistributes knowledge and dilutes American dominance over global research. However, the loss of disillusioned US-based scientists is a net gain elsewhere. The weakening of US research leadership opens space for Europe and Asia to expand their scientific influence. Europe is well-positioned to absorb this shift, drawing on institutional infrastructure, transnational networks, and appeal as a space offering welfare protection and a high quality of life.

While Europe may lead in regulation-intensive fields, Asia - driven by China, India and regional innovation hubs - can pursue development-focused models anchored in long-term planning and state-backed research. China, in particular, may use the opening to advance its own scientific models, supported by large-scale investments and increasingly competitive conditions for high-skilled migrants. If China capitalizes on this exodus, it could absorb much of this talent - and, in doing so, tilt global scientific leadership.

The influx of US-trained scientists becomes not only a boost to research excellence, but a lever for reordering global hierarchies of expertise. Institutional responses across Europe and Asia should be strategic. Talent absorption feeds national innovation strategies and enhances soft power. For instance, China may scale up various initiatives with greater flexibility, aiming to capture expertise while managing reputational risks.